Trappers Play A Key Role
In a world where humans interact
with wildlife habitat in countless ways, management
of certain animal populations will always be
necessary.
Uncontrolled, many species can
infringe on real human needs. We may only think of
rodents or insects in a grain storage facility to
appreciate the need for action.
Parts of the world, like Western
Europe, are now so heavily urbanized that the main
challenge for conservationists is to protect what
little is left of wildlife habitat.
Even in these countries, however,
wildlife must be managed. In Holland and Switzerland
(often cited as places where trapping has been
discouraged), state employees must now be paid to
trap and shoot muskrats which are seriously damaging
dikes, canals and river banks. Uncontrolled,
muskrats are capable of astounding rate of
reproduction: females can produce more than twenty
young each year, while females born in the first
Spring litters may produce their own young by Fall.
Some countries, including Canada
and the United States, are fortunate to still have
vast undeveloped lands and plentiful wildlife. The
"surplus" produced by most wildlife species each
year represents a valuable natural renewable
resource for people living on the land in these
countries.
Regulated trapping helps to
smooth out the "boom and bust" cycles which
characterize some wildlife populations when Nature
is left to do the managing.
In many areas, animal populations
must be controlled to protect human activities:
bears destroy beehives; coyotes kill livestock;
wolves prey heavily on young moose, deer and caribou
which local people depend upon for food and income;
raccoons raid cornfields; hungry deer and elk ravage
winter-stored hay; foxes, mink and weasels have a
taste for domestic poultry; beavers can flood
farmland and roadways.
Wildlife can also serve as a
reservoir for diseases (like rabies and tuleremia)
which are potentially dangerous to humans. Beaver
and muskrat can suffer horribly for weeks before
finally succumbing to tuleremia or other infectious
haemorrhagic diseases. (Foxes with rabies also take
weeks to die.) Natural, yes, but hardly "humane".
Household pets are susceptible to
distemper, rabies, heartworm, parovirus, mange and
leptospirosis, all of which can be acquired from
infected furbearers. According to Charles Pils, a
biologist with the Wisconsin Department of Natural
Resources;
While trapping is not the
solution to every wildlife disease outbreak,
under certain circumstances it can reduce
threats to the health of humans and domestic
animals ... By removing population excesses
which promote diseases such as canine distemper.
. .in a localized situation, trapping can reduce
and even stop the spread of a disease outbreak.
For all these reasons - even if
furs were not valuable - trapping would remain an
important wildlife management tool.
CAN'T TRAPPING
THREATEN ANIMAL POPULATIONS?
No, because trapping is
highly regulated and controlled. Today, all
major fur-producing countries have implemented
effective wildlife management programs. The
trapper plays much the same role as a farmer: he
seeks to maintain the maximum number of animals
his land can support, in healthy condition, by
removing some each year.
HOW IS TRAPPING
CONTROLLED?
Trappers are licensed and the
quantity of furs taken is constantly monitored
by wildlife biologists. Government agencies
control the annual harvest by setting limited
"seasons" (sometimes only a few weeks) for each
species. The dates and duration vary from region
to region, according to local conditions. Where
necessary, specific harvesting quotas may also
be applied.
CAN NATIONAL
CONTROLS FAIL?
That is always a danger.
Poaching is a serious problem in some parts of
the world. That was one of the reasons for the
establishment of the Convention on International
Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Flora and
Fauna (CITES).
Since 1973, more than ninety
countries have joined this international "safety
net" for wildlife. Trade is monitored and
controls are placed on the import and export of
products from plants or animals which might be
endangered by excessive exploitation.
WHY NOT USE GUNS
INSTEAD OF TRAPS?
Most fur-bearing animals are
nocturnal, well-camouflaged, wary and generally
solitary. Traps are the only practical way to
take them consistently.
WHAT ABOUT TRAPS
WITH STEEL "TEETH"? DON'T THEY CAUSE INJURIES?
The use of such traps is no
longer promoted by any trappers' association.
Humane considerations aside, "teeth" aren't
necessary to hold an animal. The only place you
are likely to see such traps today is in a
museum - or in the brochures of anti-trapping
groups.
HOW LONG ARE
ANIMALS LEFT IN TRAPS?
Furbearers are mostly
nocturnal and so are generally taken late at
night or in the early morning hours. Ideally,
traps can be set one day and inspected early the
next morning. In many areas, it is now required
by law that live-holding traps be visited every
twenty-four hours. Where quick-killing sets can
be used, there is less urgency. Still, it is
always in the trapper's best interest to visit
his traps often.
DON'T TRAPS ALSO
CATCH MANY OF THE WRONG ANIMALS - WHICH ARE JUST
THROWN AWAY?
No. Trappers cannot afford to
make the arduous tour of their lines just to
discard unwanted animals - and they don't. In
fact, trappers have many ways of assuring only
the animals they want enter their "sets". These
methods are explained in detail in
trapper-instruction manuals.
SURELY THE MONEY
EARNED FROM TRAPPING IS NOT IMPORTANT TO ANYONE
THESE DAYS?
In many regions, trapping
provides an important source of part-time
income, especially during the winter months when
other paid employment may be scarce.
Often, fur trapping is one
component of a resource-based economy. People
may harvest shrimp or fish, or they may work in
forestry, agriculture or as guides during the
summer months, and trap in the winter.
Many very skilled trappers
hold regular jobs, but take their vacations
during trapping season, valuing the extra income
and the opportunity to maintain traditions they
have been brought up with.
In the far north, the fur
trade is one of the few sources of cash income
available to people living in an essentially
land- based economy. In such communities, even
relatively small amounts of money can go a very
long way. This is especially true for native
people who account for a large number of
Canadian trappers.
WHAT IS BEING
DONE TO ENSURE HUMANE TRAPPING PRACTICES?
After years of preliminary
work by trappers and others, a multi-million
dollar research project has now been established
under the administration of the Fur Institute of
Canada, with research at several Canadian and
U.S. universities, to identify the most
effective and humane trapping systems for each
furbearing species.
Trappers, government and the
International Fur Trade Federation have
supported and contributed funding for this
important research.
Ultimately, the humane
application of any trapping system depends upon
the skill and care of the individual trapper in
the field. For this reason, hand-in-hand with
continuing research, training programs are being
revised and expanded - to provide trappers
everywhere with information about the best
methods currently available. In many regions,
such courses are already mandatory before
receiving a trapping license.
Scott Hartman, president of
the National Trappers Association, has said:
For North America's more
than one-half million trappers, the purpose of
trapping varies - from assisting wildlife
biologists in furbearer studies, to population
and disease control, protection of habitat
against soil erosion, and for food, clothing and
income. And yet, thanks to good management
practices, furbearers are more numerous in North
America today than 100 years ago. The public
needs to know that there is no trapping of
endangered species and that we continue to
research and encourage the use of the most
effective and humane trapping techniques.
Trapping has been an integral part of our
American heritage, and we intend to see that it
continues to contribute to abundant wildlife and
sound management programs.
Address to the NTA annual convention, at
Peoria, Illinois, 11 August 1988.